Dustings #104

I was reminded recently of this trick by Pit Hartling. It’s a card calling routine where he drinks orange juice to imbue himself with a super-powered memory.

The book this routine was published in came out over 20 years ago. I think it’s a good example of “early Imp technology.”

As J.S. wrote in an email recently: “I'm sure people ask for his orange juice trick, not his card calling trick.”

I bet that’s true. As I said in Tuesday’s post, the Imp is usually the most memorable part of an effect to non-magicians.

But, this is also an example of what I referred to on Tuesday as a Weak Imp, because he never suggests why drinking orange juice makes his memory good. If there was more of a story there, more of a connection there, it would be stronger. As of now, it’s just kind of arbitrary. Which is why, if you had asked me about it, I would have remembered Pit’s OJ trick as a thing that existed, but I wouldn’t have remembered the premise at all (a memory demonstration).

Here’s the tweak I would make if I wanted to drink O.J. on stage and do a memory demonstration.

“Do you know how they say an elephant never forgets? Well, there’s some truth to that. Elephants have an extremely large cerebral cortex. And they’re able to recall people they encountered decades earlier. And, in some cultures, elephant semen is known for its memory strengthening capabilities. And uh… I have to tell you… it works. I’ve been drinking a liter a day. And… I mean… yes… it’s fucking disgusting… even just procuring it is… soul-crushing… but it works! I’ll show you. I have some here. I mix it with orange juice to mask the taste a little. The no-pulp kind. The semen itself already has a bit of a… chew to it.” 🤢


One thing I didn’t hit on during Monday’s mailbag post about Xeno is that I think the best Xeno sites are the ones that have a reason for existing that is not already addressed by other sites online.

For example, I wanted a Xeno site for ESP symbols. Now, the easiest way to show someone the ESP symbols online would be to tell them to do a google search or wikipdia search. Not go to a specific site. So I created a site that’s about how to mentally send the ESP images. This isn’t something that can be found just anywhere, so it makes sense to direct them to that specific site.

Similarly, the site used in the trick Big Data vs Holistic Mind-Reading, is one that the spectator would have to visit in order to tell the story that goes along with the trick.

I think you can get into trouble if you’re like, “Hey, I’d like you to think of a band. Go to this random webpage with bands on it.” That can raise suspicion. Why do I need to go to a website? Why this website? etc.

So if you’re going to create a Xeno site, try to create one with information that can’t just be found somewhere else online or in the spectator’s own head.

For example, if the subject you wanted to use was bands, then maybe a site created by a guy who surveyed band’s fan bases to find the band’s most beloved song. So here is a site of 100 bands/songs. “So find a band you like. And one where you agree that the song listed is one of their best.” blah, blah, blah. The point being, this explains why you’re directing them to this particular site.


Here are some ideas on the Damsel Cull Force (version 3) from G. Dabat. For me, the most valuable idea in the video below is—when forcing two cards—giving them the option of if they’d like the two cards above the card they inserted, the two cards below, or one on either side of the card.


Uni-Multiple Selection

“I just had a funny thought. It was imagining you doing a multiple selection routine. You know, the kind of thing where like ten cards are selected and you find them all semi-rapid fire style.

But then that made me wonder - have you actually tackled a trick like that?”—JT

I get this sort of thing a lot. “How would you perform [some trick I’d never do].”

“I wouldn’t really do that trick.”

“Okay, well, gun to your head, how would you do it?”

“Oooh, gun to my head?”

“Yeah.”

“Pull the trigger.”

I would never do the Multiple Selection, just because it’s not my sort of trick.

But if I had to… gun to my head, and I didn’t want to eat a bullet and all of that…

Methodologically

I would do something that forces the cards in a relatively quick manner and then I’d hand the deck out to be shuffled. If the audience doesn’t shuffle the deck, then the trick is just: “He’s very good at keeping control of multiple cards.” I understand that that’s the goal for a lot of people with the multiple selection routine. They want to look like someone who has mastery over a deck of cards. But I don’t really like any trick where the audience is left with the feeling: “Wow, he must practice a lot.”

By allowing them to shuffle, they’ll still credit me with the magic (which there’s probably no way around in a multiple selection routine) but their mind will be forced to go to some weirder places beyond just, “I guess he can keep track of all those cards while he’s shuffling.”

I’d take the shuffled deck back and find the first card in a boring way. I’d spread through the deck and slide a card out. Card #1 which would be marked in some way on the back so I could remove it from the shuffled deck without looking at the faces. I’d give it to the first person. As I built up the reveal to that card—and the focus was on that—I’d do a deck switch for another deck with cards 2-10 ready to go on top.

Presentationally

Hmmm…this is where you run into a wall a little bit. There are some tricks that lend themselves to all sorts of presentations. OOTW, a 2-card transposition, Ambitious Card. But a trick like the Multiple Selection which consist of 10 or so variations on the same climax… that’s rough. I don’t even really love a three phase trick. So 10 phases is definitely a stretch. Not only that, but it’s sort of a trick that feels designed for a formal magic presentation—just the fact that you’re performing for a larger group of people suggests that

To make it feel like less of a “show trick”, what if we performed the same trick for less people? For example, imagine doing the multiple selection for one person. And I’m not just saying have one person select a card and then find it. I’m saying having one person select a bunch of cards and then find them one by one.

The question is… why would you ever do this?

I’m not sure.

How about this. What if you told your friend you were “auditioning” to get into this exclusive magic society, and you might need their help with something sometime soon.

Then the next time you’re hanging out at your place with them, you explain this society is kind of corny, but it would give you access to a lot of people and secret information that can’t be found anywhere else.

[Reinforcing the idea that there are magic secrets that aren’t to be found online is always a good thing.]

You explain that the audition process involves variations on the most classic trick in magic: they pick a card, you find the card.

“There are ten levels. It’s a system sort of like belts in karate. The higher up you test, the more advance you are. There’s a table of ten guys, they each select a card and return them to the deck themselves and shuffle the cards. And you go one-by-one trying to find their cards in increasing levels of difficulty. If you get past level three, you’re granted conditional membership into the organization. If you get past level five, you get full membership. At level eight, you’re in the inner circle. The final two levels are just theoretical.”

Then you have your friend select 10 cards in some simple manner and have them write them down (or just remember them if you’re performing for the World Memory Champion). Then have them shuffle up the deck.

Here I would do a slight variation on the method I was originally thinking above.

So you would have this list of the levels of finding a card.

Level One: With the cards face up.

Level Two: With the cards face-down

Level Three: Blindfolded

As you’re finding the “Level-One” card, cut or cull the Level Three card to the top.

During Level-Two, you’ll find the card because it’s marked.

At Level-Three, because you don’t have a blindfold, have your friend cover your eyes instead.

As you’re reorienting yourself after Level-Three, with the three previously found cards already on the table, that’s when you could switch the deck (This is a type of “Anchored” deck switch.)

After that, you just follow through with your stacked deck, level by level.

Essentially, this would be a way of presenting a wide variety of disconnected card revelations but with one cohesive narrative.

You could do some standard Multiple Selection reveals.

Level Four - With One Hand

Level Eight - Behind Your Back Spinning the Card Over Your Shoulder

But you could also work in some more involved ways to reveal the card.

Level Six - Wrap the deck in a handkerchief and cause only the chosen card to pass through

Level Nine - Mentally direct a 3rd-party to find the card

Level Ten - Find the card by stabbing it out of the air from a tossed deck.

You’d need a little acting ability to pull this off. For the first few levels, you want to seem relatively confident, but not 100% certain. For the next few levels, you want to make it seem like success is possible, but not probable. And for the final levels you want to make it seem you never thought you’d be able to reach these levels, like you’re a little astonished yourself, but we might as well try them because we’re on a roll.

You could do this presentation with an audience of 2 or 3 people (each taking a few cards). Or 10. Or in a theater setting. But I think the smaller your audience is, the more they’ll get lost in the premise. If I’m performing for an audience of 100 it’s unlikely that I’d be trying things that I didn’t think would be likely to work. But with just one or a few people, it’s possible I’d try things just for the fun of it.

Often I write about splitting up a performance over hours or days. But in this instance, I think you’d want to string them all together in one 20-30 minute interaction. And you’ll want to do stuff that feels different. Not just all flourishy card reveals.

Doing them all together (rather than splitting them up over time) will allow the trick to build momentum, which makes sense with this premise. You want it to feel like Who Wants To Be a Millionaire. Like you started off with something easy and only mildly interesting, but each revelation builds, becomes more difficult, and you want to push on just to see how far you can take. By the time you stab the card out of the air (or whatever) in Level 10, you should be as surprised and confused by your success as anyone.

Of course, then you come back a week later:

“So, remember the audition thing you helped me with the other night? I had it last night. I fucked up the first card. I can try again in five years.”

This keeps the focus on that one crazy night between you where everything worked.

Illuminated

Continuing on the Imp talk from yesterday, I’ve recently found a good one for use in the Spectator as Magician/Mindreader plot.

I’ve long argued that this premise needs some added element to it, or it’s just transparent to people. When we tested that notion, that proved to be the case.

And of course that’s the case. When they give the football to the Make-A-Wish kid and he scores a touchdown, he might feel he accomplished something, but that’s because he’s seven. An adult wouldn’t be like, “Well, I guess I’m now great at football!”

Similarly, if you tell someone, “You’re going to read my mind,” and do a trick with that premise, they’re not going to think, “Well, I guess this nice young magician just showed me that I have a power I’ve never exhibited before and never will again.”

I mean, that’s fine if you’re just looking to dress up the trick a little. “I’ll read your mind, then you read mine.” If you’re just using it as a throwaway premise, you don’t need to put much effort into it. (But also don’t expect to get too much out of it.)

If we want to genuinely mess with people’s minds a little and get them to at least consider the idea that they did something truly out of the ordinary, then they need to be subjected to something that will seemingly affect them in some manner. Something on the edge of plausibility.

Thomas H., recently wrote me about an app called Lumenate. This is a “light therapy” app where you sit in a dark room and hold the phone up to your closed eyes and the flashlight of your phone flashes in such a way that… well… here’s how the makers of the app describe it:

Lumenate uses research-backed light sequences from your phone's flashlight to neurologically guide you into an altered state of consciousness between that of deep meditation and classic psychedelics.

That may all be horse-shit, but I will say that using this app you definitely get a sense of: “This is different.”. It produces a kind of psychedelic-kaleidoscopic light show on the inside of your closed eyelids. And whether or not it actually has any effect on your brain, it certainly seems reasonable that it could.

You can get the app for free. There’s paid plans, but you don’t need them for our purposes.

Now, what you don’t want to do is tell people you have this secret technology that’s going to affect them in some particular way. You don’t want the chance of them saying “Oh, is this the Lumenate app?”

The approach I take is to tell people there’s an app that uses rhythmic light flashes to affect brainwaves. And I have a “friend” who has discovered a way to “hack” the usage of the app so that it can produce some interesting results. I then have them use the app, but I hold the phone for them and I move it nearer and close to their closed eyes at set times. The idea being that changing the distance of the light source in some predetermined manner can help “tune” the person’s brain for a particular ability (heightened intuition, photographic memory, etc.)

I don’t make them go through a full session on the app, which is 10 minutes. And I don’t have them listen to the audio from the app. I just do it for a few minutes and talk through it with them myself. You want to make sure it’s not too intense for them. And, of course, if they have some sort of sensitivity to flashing lights, you would never do this for them.

Altogether, it makes for a perfect little interaction. The Lumenate app will be a new experience for most people, followed by (ideally) some sort of amazing happening. And because—as you explain to them—the abilities they gain will wear off after a few minutes, they are no loose ends for them to pick at later on. They can assume it must have all been a trick. But they can’t ever quite dismiss the possibility that maybe for a few minutes they had telekinetic powers (or whatever ability you endowed them with).

The Imp Formula

An Imp is “the thing you do which causes the magic to happen.”

It’s a subject magicians cared so little about, that I had to invent the term for it.

Before 2017 if someone asked, “What’s the word to describe the thing the magician does that causes the magic to happen?”

The response would be: “Snapping.”

“No. I mean… that’s just one way of doing it.”

“Yes, correct. Sometimes I snap with my thumb and middle finger. And sometimes I snap with my thumb and index finger to give the audience a real thrill.”

“No… sorry. I guess I’m not being clear. I mean, what is the broad, general term for the thing the magician does which causes the magic to occur.”

“Oh, the general term? I don’t know… uhm… Rhythmic Finger…Clacking?? Or something? I’m not quite sure what you’re asking for.”

Look, I understand the utility of snapping your fingers. It’s quick. It’s easy. And it’s something. This is I heard repeatedly when learning magic in the 80s and 90s in books and videos. “You need to do something to let people know the magic happened. So snap your fingers.”

Oh. Okay.

I understand that if you’re doing table-side magic, you can’t slow things down and bring everyone out into the parking lot to harness the dark essence in the spot where you claim a drifter was murdered in 1986 in order to bring their card to the top of the deck.

And if you’re doing an office Christmas party, you can’t say, “Let’s all make out and see if we can channel our sexual energy into this Chinese coin and make it fall off this ribbon.”

But when performing in social, casual settings, we often do have the time to use a more immersive Imp than snapping our fingers or casting a shadow.

The thing to keep in mind is that it’s not just a decorative detail that’s nice to have. It’s not slapping a bow on the present. It is—when executed properly—perhaps the most memorable part of the trick.

Barring a wildly memorable, simple, visual climax (which many trick don’t have). The storyline to the trick (and a good Imp is part of a storyline) is what people seem to remember the most.

Sure, they might remember the general feeling of amazement and enjoyment. But a few weeks later, they’re not remembering: “There were three selections made. They were placed in different parts of the deck. The four Aces were dropped on top and the selections were now between the Aces. Then the Aces disappeared, and he was left holding just the three selections. If I’m remembering correctly, they were the Jack of Diamonds, the 5 of Clubs, and the 9 of Clubs. Yes, of course. It’s clear as day.”

Here is the Imp Formula. And it’s very simple.

Step One: Do something somewhat unusual.

Step Two: Tie that to the premise of your trick.

— If I come over your house, that’s not unusual.

— If I come over your house at 11 at night and show you a trick, that’s probably unusual. But if I don’t connect coming over to your house at 11 at night to the trick, then it’s not an Imp. It’s just me being a dickhead and annoying you as you’re getting ready for bed.

— If I come over your house at 11 at night and say, “I’m sorry. I know it’s late, but now is the only time I can show you this trick. It only works at 11:06.” And I show you the Ambitious Card, that’s what I call a Weak Imp. I’m telling you there’s some sort of connection between the Imp and the trick, but it doesn’t make much sense. So there’s no logical connection in your mind.

Sometimes a Weak Imp can still be intriguing. “I don’t know why it’s like this, but this is the only time that it works.” That can maybe be interesting, but it’s not ideal.

— If I come over your house at 11 at night on March 19th and say, “I’m sorry. I know it’s late, but now is the only time I can show you this trick. We’ve only got a few minutes.” And I perform On Edge by Angelo Carbone

and I tell you we have this brief window of time on the equinox where this will work.

Well, then you have a sort of symbiotic situation where the Imp and the Trick are both supporting each other. The Imp is the equinox. The Trick is making a card castle balance impossibly. The equinox suggests “balance.” It all works together nicely.

And the Imp provides another way into the memory of this event. You can imagine someone hearing about the upcoming equinox and remembering the time when their friend came over late at night to show them this weird quirk of the universe. And in their memory it was a huge card castle balancing on one little card.

Whereas if the magician created a card castle and made it magically balance with the snap of his fingers, it feels more like a weird, arbitrary power to exhibit. The cool visual of the balancing cards is still there. But it’s just sort of in a bubble with no tether to the real world.

You could say, “Well, that’s what I do. I’m a Magician. I do things that are untethered to the real world!” I get that. I can only say that in my experience, people want something they can relate to in some way. And a pointless impossibility is hard to relate to.

The Imp doesn’t have to be believable (it really shouldn’t be). It’s there to be story material. Use them to help tell a story other than, “I am the god of Dumb Miracles. Watch as I snap my finger and make some pointless, impossible, dumb thing happen.”

Mailbag #109 — Splooge, Xeno, and My "Legacy"

Will you ever do another Splooge week? Or even a book of non-magic content? —OW

Possibly to both. I think I have a book’s worth of non-magic content. A lot of it related to happiness, productivity, leading a full life. (And then other stuff like “How to Hear More Farts”) I’m not quite sure what I’m going to do with it all or what the interest is in it. But it will be mentioned here or in the newsletter if anything ever happens with it.


I seem to use xeno quite frequently. Quick question.

How do you get them to go to the url and under what pretext?

"I found this web page blablabla?"

Or do you send it to them by message or what?

Maybe its just me but it doesnt feel natural to me to show them a QR of the web on my phone (one of the xeno options) to send them to the web.

Specially when its one of the websites created by myself. (Long weird urls) —JFC

Xeno is one of the most underrated magic apps out there. They go to a website on their phone, look at anything on the website, and you can tell them what they’re looking at. It’s just so direct and clean. And there’s no limit to the theme of the website and therefore the premise of the effect.

While there are some sites set up for Xeno that use a normal, easy to pass along URL with just a verbal prompt, e.g., “Go to star sign dot me.” The custom lists that users create have URLs that are a little funky. Not questionably funky. Like they’re not URLs that are like:

go0gel.com

But they look like this tinyhost.pw/list/87weR4tC80.

Which is not the sort of link you’re just going to casually mention to someone. “So, I was at my favorite site the other day. Do you ever go to this site? Tinyhost dot pee doubleyou slash list slash eight seven lower-case doubleyou ee upper-case are the number four lower-case tee uppercase see eight zero?”

So how to get people to these sites?

Marc Kerstein provides an easy option where you show someone a QR code on your phone, and they can scan that, and it takes them to the site. But honestly, I’ve never shown someone a QR code on my phone to take them to a site in real life, so I wouldn’t do it for a trick either.

Here are the ways I do it:

1. Text them the link. It will just look something like this.

2. If you’re performing remotely, email them the link.

3. If you want to have a URL you can say to them, go to tinyurl.com to shorten the link with a custom alias. For example, I could say to you, “Go to tiny URL dot com slash bandly.” And that takes you to a Xeno site about rock bands.

4. If there’s a trick you’re going to be using regularly and you want a really easy URL to direct them to, just buy one and redirect it to the Xeno site. This is cheap and easy. For example, I just bought

JoshuaJaysDickSmells.lol

for two dollars.

If they look at the URL again, it will be the more complicated Xeno URL, but that’s okay. There’s nothing magic-tricky about the Xeno URL. It’s just a complicated one. In the rare instance where they might look at the URL and wonder why it doesn’t say what they originally typed in, you just say, “Oh, I guess they forward it to that site? I don’t know.” It’s not your website. You don’t have to answer for it.

I emailed Marc and he mentioned that Xeno is on his agenda for an update. One that would add new features and also make it easier to create Xeno sites. In that update, he may also add the functionality to connect the Xeno site to your custom URL, so it wouldn’t just forward it along, but it would be at that URL itself.

As of now, there are a ton of user created Xeno sites. I would like to encourage the practice of users buying cheap domains for the best ones as well to share among other Xeno users (there’s a facebook page). So you create a page that lists, for example, a wide range of emotions. Then you buy emotionalbreakdown.info for 3 bucks and forward it to the Xeno site. (But turn off “autorenew” when you buy the domain, so you’re not on the hook for it in future years when the price goes up to $25 or $40 or whatever).


I wonder how much you pay attention to these things:

  • Sites that pop up that are clearly inspired by you. Sometimes just rewriting things you’ve already written, like a Jerx cover band.

  • Premises you’ve championed coming up in other performers work.

  • Your style of writing up effects showing up in others’ releases.

  • How terms like “social magic” and “casual magic” are being used in ad copy much more frequently.

[…]

Do you ever think about how far your ideas have spread, or your legacy in magic? —MMB

I give zero thought to it. If I cared about a “legacy” in magic, I wouldn’t write under a pseudonym.

I’m happy some people find value in the approach I’ve written about here. But I also like that it’s not mainstream. If anything, I wish these ideas were spread less.

Much of what I write about here is stupid. And a lot of it is just general magic talk. However, some of these concepts I’ve written up I’ve been using to produce extraordinarily mystifying, or intense moments of magic with people.

Unfortunately, the more common these techniques/premises become, the less potent they will be.

So it’s a combination of wanting to get the ideas out to the people who will use them, but also not wanting these ideas to get fucked-out to the point where they’re no longer useful.

It’s like I’ve found this hidden tree deep in the woods that grows this unusual fruit. It’s delicious, and more than I could ever eat on my own. So I’m compelled to share the location with others. But if I share it with people, and they share it with more, and crowds flock to it, eagerly plucking its fruit, then there will be none for anyone. And the influx of visitors—trampling around the grounds and picking through the limbs—might just kill the tree.

And just selfishly, I don’t want the ideas overused because I want to be able to keep putting them into practice for myself.

So no, I’m not interested in my legacy. I just want to keep the tree bearing fruit and make sure it gets to the people who truly enjoy it.

Dustings #103

I’m not sure what the allure of such a thing is, but a number of times over the course of this site’s lifetime, people have asked me for a “random blog post” link. Well, Squarespace doesn’t have such a thing built into it. Or an easy way to code such a thing, at least not that I can tell. Fortunately, my secretary, Miss Nanny Finebottom, has been studying a little JavaScript and has come up with a way to do it. So now, on the right side of your computer screen (or under the first page of posts if you’re on your phone) below the Search box, you’ll find a link which goes to a random post. See below.

Sorry, I just wanted to be stupid and post a screenshot to illustrate a screen you’re already looking at.


Miss Finebottom also found a great Hook for any effects that are done with a hypnotism premise. It’s a legitimate document called

You can find the full document here.

You can print out a copy and keep it on an end-table or something when someone comes over. If they notice it, they’re bound to comment on it, and this sort of thing can be used to naturally flow into a seemingly “unplanned” performance. Which is always a satisfying way to get into a trick.

Even if they don’t notice it or say something, an object like this is still a relatively gentle way to segue into a performance. Just ask them to hand it to you and make some comment about how you’ve been studying some of the ideas in here for something you’re working on. “Actually… can I try something with you?”

Here, the document serves to “soften them up” a little bit. Rather than if they were to just come over to your house and you say, out of the blue, “Hey, I want to hypnotize you!” With something like this, the Hook introduces the subject, then you comment on why you have the Hook, and then you can be like, “You know what might be fun?…” As if it’s just now occurring to you.


In an effort to keep posts and ideas together, I’ve started adding an asterisk to posts that have been updated. (If there are more updates, I’ll add more asterisks. I don’t care. They’re free.)

If there’s a small update to a post, I’ll just make the update with no notation.

If there’s an update of some significance, I’ll make the update and add a * to its title.

If there’s an update that I think everyone needs to see, it will be its own post or mentioned here in one of the Friday posts. So you don’t need to go searching for asterisks unless you really want to.

As of now, only one post, The Protection Spell*, has had an update that I thought warranted notation. But I just wanted to let you know in case you see that in the future.


The Juxe

Today’s music is terrible. It’s just auto-tuned songs about ‘mother-effer this’ and ‘mother-effer that.’ Nobody can play an instrument or even sing anymore!
— Someone who hasn’t bought a new album since Billy Ocean’s “Suddenly” (1984)

It’s been ages since I’ve posted any music here. (Most of you can leave now.)

The idea that there’s no good music being made anymore is perpetuated by people whose source for “new music” is the Super Bowl Halftime Show.

There’s always great music being made by talented people.

An easy transitional step to listening to more modern music is listen to new music that’s been inspired by music of the past. So here are some songs that came out on albums last year that don’t sound too different from whenever you thought “good music” was being made.

1950s

Steven Sanchez recalls the crooners of the 50s with Until I Found You.

1960s

The Televisionaries recall the Merseybeat scene of the early 60s with You Can Do What You Want To Do.

1960/1970s

The Lemon Twigs recall the sunshine pop of the late 60s, early 70s with My Golden Years.

1970s

Girl Ray recalls the disco of the 70s with Everybody’s Saying That.

1980s

The Uni Boys recall the power-pop of the early 80s with Let’s Watch A Movie.

1990s

Palehound recalls 90s girl-rockers with The Clutch.

Spittin' Bars

Here’s a weird sort of prediction that’s not really a prediction. I’m not really sure how it would come off to people. I suppose if they know you do magic, they’ll think of it as a magic trick. Otherwise, this is something you could play off in another way.

It’s a stage thing. Or possibly a party thing. I’ve never actually done it. It’s just an idea at this point. But you might want to take it and run with it.

I was watching videos of a well-known improvisational/freestyle rapper named Chris Turner.

And I say “well-known” as in “he’s well-known for an improvisational rapper.” He’s not, like, Obama or Kardashian well-known. Your grandma won’t come home and be like, “My pastor and everyone in my sewing-circle is just buzzing about Chris Turner.”

If you haven’t seen him, watch that video. If you can’t watch it at the moment, come back to it. He does wildly impressive spontaneous rap songs based on audience suggestions.

And after watching a few the other night, I thought, “You could fake this.”

Using an AmazeBox from Vanishing Inc. (or something similar) you could force the randomly chosen words for which you’ve pre-written an entire set of lyrics.

You could hand out, say, four different colors of paper slips. You tell the people (or have instructions on the paper itself) that if they have a red slip they should write down a famous real or fictional person, if they have a yellow slip they should write down a historical event, people with blue slips should write down an activity, and people with green slips should write down any object. This way, when you dump out the slips, you can have an audience member (or members) select one of each color, and you wouldn’t have to worry about them picking duplicates of your force words.

You could also, I suppose, only hand out one color of paper and then have the force slips folded in four different ways, and then you do the choosing yourself. But I think that’s weaker. I think you really want to have the audience do the picking.

Out of context—in a talent contest or an amateur night or something—you could probably play this off as a real skill.

I could see it as an M.C. thing too. Like maybe you come out early on and say you were hoping to demonstrate your talent tonight, but your talent is “speed learning” so it’s not really something that makes for a good demonstration in and of itself. “But I have this list of activities that I thought would make for an entertaining demonstration. I’m going to have you randomly select one and I will teach it to myself backstage and by the end of the night I’ll be the best in the world at it.” The list includes things like breakdancing, yodeling, contortionism, hula-hooping, etc.

The next time you’re back on stage, you had out the slips of paper. And then for the finale, you collect them and then proceed to bust a rhyme.

It would be fun to come on all quiet and trepidatious before switching over to hyper-confident and spitting fire when the beat drops. Like…

Okay… so what suggestions do we have here. Okay… uhm… this one says Candle. This one says Shrek. This one says ‘the launch of Sputnik.’ And this one says Choking. Oh god… this is going to be impossible isn’t it…I don’t know…

CH-CH-CH-CHECK YOURSELF, BEFORE YOU WRECK YOURSELF
CHOKE ON MY DICK UNTIL YOU’RE GREEN LIKE GODDAMN SHREK HIMSELF

You get the idea.

In a straight magic show, you’d probably need some other element to it.

Maybe you say you’re getting out of the magic game and working on your freestyle rap career. And you’re going to hijack this performance to launch it tonight. Do the rap, but leave out one of the suggestions (maybe get five suggestions instead of four for this). And at the end someone will say (or you have a plant say) “Hey, you forgot [the other suggestion].” And you hang your head in shame and mumble something about how maybe you’re not a good freestyle rapper. And you should go back to magic. And you flip over the seven-digit number you predicted earlier in the performance to show that it spells out the final suggested word that you forgot to include in your rap. (Cryptext style.)

That’s as far as I’ve taken the idea. If you end up pursuing it, let me know.